- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
is a significant concern for physicians. Central8 f0 c6 ]/ S* X; R1 k. A
precocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
0 W# k# S$ v. G+ ^/ Pthrough the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has
3 Q# x0 H n% D/ Ua higher incidence of organic central nervous system
2 n0 r5 R) l0 ~) ]" glesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested3 P& R/ K; A8 |$ W7 G" C s( |( R- y1 a
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic6 h1 ]8 J# Y! }! f6 g8 w6 n
hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-6 N" f5 R" N- U& x" ^; C
cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
& L5 U: p+ E. t! W# M7 Lreport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
: K5 _! M+ g4 `2 i& d! z( Fenlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-6 d2 E- h, v! q0 o' f W8 T
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due3 M$ p% p) J: I0 x4 y( ?% e
to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
: N* G/ E" Y2 Wthe father. The family initially concealed this infor-
& j+ G2 y ]# i0 S4 { u! emation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
% e' K, u2 \/ qchild. Given the widespread and easy availability of7 s# @4 C7 c1 Y9 J! f$ a6 ~" p. h
testosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-
- H- h% ?2 ]; Z- B- N7 N6 h+ tbly more common than the rare case report in the% Z; _6 O a4 S& O8 o4 l! g% r
literature.4* o" U& C2 @! d9 t$ G( p
Patient Report
! e: z6 ^! n% u! N' W! WA 16-month-old white child was referred to the# `3 o3 ]' C& s9 } X
endocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern1 w- K# e- L) A% X4 v7 y, i
of early sexual development. His mother noticed
! Y% k" v% t& @5 K3 rlight colored pubic hair development when he was
8 H# m6 |/ y, o* V7 XFrom the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of
5 f: q6 p9 h! Z, V1 QSouth Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
% y9 U* ?8 }5 T8 x9 C6 @Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,7 F, @0 E1 n* E M. k
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
6 ~3 d: Y) q# k# A$ x! ~- s8 |+ ZMedicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;( T J# |' x; u1 G1 [
e-mail: [email protected].) t1 l4 i0 J/ E: ~/ m& ~' |
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
& ]8 F0 ]$ q" `$ a; d& tdarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-/ c3 t ^! x6 x$ ]6 D$ I0 X- x& T
ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
c! I" e. C+ o$ o* {was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with' D+ ]# B$ | b. w2 G" {7 k. O
a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
: a! I# n2 g7 M8 R9 F& s) ~( M20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year- o1 a/ z" _2 L- O$ M( c
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with+ h0 {8 ^/ b2 ?# \- `
solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,
7 J+ f4 s5 m' B9 a O6 cand his psychosocial and psychomotor development ]- e' e, r C( F4 Q% Y+ s
was age appropriate.
# o' h& |1 J3 G8 W+ k( W* SThe family history was remarkable for the father,) k3 c' g3 f) ?5 }5 S/ H9 J7 }9 M, @
who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
5 a: {# b* e0 s$ C" ?0 m/ q9 s3 owhich was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
" w) p$ v, k* }2 Y ]: pheight was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
- W# d1 q8 M; R- f( O4 xearly puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.* g6 T4 P. W0 J+ {8 i5 g. r2 v
The father denied taking any other medication. The
8 a1 M2 u7 n1 I4 B5 ]& Tchild’s mother was in good health. Her menarche& \& q5 p" S, N6 O) q
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet: R' U/ _2 }0 c& ]7 Q8 M
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-+ q `) f! @5 k5 L1 M* q
cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
* O" B! ?3 o8 z, e' u3 o+ Vtives. There were no siblings.
/ l+ x; {( ~3 XPhysical Examination
5 i/ H p" P8 sThe physical examination revealed a very active,. D4 R/ O% ]9 z1 y
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented
1 G0 h4 i4 F, h- ?4 T$ U. ja blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was9 t) F1 J9 R3 `4 e, f# t
90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg( Y9 j" @/ U/ t) N9 e+ Z; ?
(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth5 m& ]1 D6 L; v7 M# d
velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of4 G; T; j4 v) v: K7 C& I
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.# V3 r: R6 V/ J
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for
' q1 {, E5 i; H- |8 p kenlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of n/ U( }! N. W9 o( N
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well4 x& _$ Q6 S% j5 ]4 [( L
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
' Q( D& o2 K! J6 i3 B4 k5 X) f( [540. w3 f5 q- ~7 N% Z2 n: a
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from: l5 P+ M E, g
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The/ {7 r6 @' D0 V( r+ T
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.$ m/ H: B8 i( z8 R+ @* z
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
$ E6 O6 A% F3 B5 q2 Voily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no/ h- a6 c% R/ x% O, h/ k! W; W# w
abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.# m* B" S2 G' R9 i! T
Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
2 {3 S a$ C( J: K* C* Ebilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion7 ]. a# H+ H+ U
of papilledema.
; }. I; C9 h) g: k4 j/ F+ qLaboratory Evaluation/ x a8 c' a$ T7 x: T% t
The bone age was consistent with 28 months by5 r( B6 B3 A5 ~( {% l7 O+ R2 i
using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-
c% o H, |) g! @logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
( P6 p* Y$ d8 Q0 x1 y( m/ skaryotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test
+ B Q p. c1 Dshowed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-8 b9 a: S: z( b4 R8 T. v. n
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
$ K+ i. n/ k! h6 g% D0 u8 F3 B4 YThe concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood* Q7 J& g+ V' M- C2 Z
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were# p9 S* N+ C& _, A& K4 @
within normal range for his age. The concentration1 i1 v- }' \, k
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL0 W# K& p1 Q9 D
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 201 q8 P# W6 c P! f7 k8 s
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
\% I5 \8 ^3 a5 N: V# s L, Vterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
6 B6 o% R7 @/ I7 a& I9 Ydesoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
: @ O1 R* T. }49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)
6 ~/ i9 }/ p S( K( l% H" gwas 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-0 K9 E+ t( I: _, N" m2 q, {
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
$ [/ z$ k+ ~* dtestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
" ^/ A$ `, H4 x' X0 g1 s; a: Xand β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than9 ^: }; h; r5 v% ~, i0 g
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular
, l3 b" j% O6 Jstimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone( D+ g. h+ d" q& P; a
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL/ l' q. `3 r6 x! n* P. T# {$ S
(prepubertal).
$ P c, k* S1 S) aThe parents were notified about the laboratory
/ a3 f( }0 U# `results and were informed that all of the tests were
" L& L: f& e+ Z; b0 Qnormal except the testosterone level was high. The
# H& Y; l2 [" M* {, E" @- efollow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to! c6 j% {1 {' a! E
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-
/ J. \/ k% ^) oever, the family did not return for 4 months.
- y( X( l+ h4 A$ G! K2 m" ]Physical examination at this time revealed that the. ?0 i3 P6 y% Q) m+ X
child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained+ Y9 J. B6 A: c5 b* B: n
2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained
" V. [7 p8 o$ z% M! v0 @unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-
$ I' x+ V6 d1 L; @$ }pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
# F, g! X; J+ m" @0 qthe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 23 D- y" t2 z6 s
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.( \3 s: u$ n2 p" g) _; y
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav- o. N6 P+ z& d! }& v$ d
ing frequent erections.
% V" l; Y X0 E3 K1 B' BBoth parents were again questioned about use of* l M# e: s* [2 K+ c& Q* o
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to% X# @; o5 F* q' h
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the; \( U* I: w7 ~- _
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541* o% H& M1 ]$ @0 H0 k3 m
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
; O4 r" o* X& C' Zing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
0 M; b4 v. q+ R9 _! v4 O$ Oa year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed8 t8 ?) n: [/ i( {
to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
6 X& k2 Q7 z1 D2 `. uscribed by his family physician for decreased libido
. h) o/ ?. X2 d% P7 Usecondary to depression.
* H5 b4 t$ O9 o2 D0 MThe child slept in the same bed with parents.9 S ~' R, x( J2 n0 \" M g6 c
The father would hug the baby and hold him on his& H4 z8 I% c- F9 F# `% h0 {1 N
chest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-
0 [! ^3 n# n K: Xnificant bare skin contact between baby and father.' l$ C* v: M) `$ Q3 {
The father also admitted that after the phone call,' R; w! A, W, h- r' i3 T9 t4 s
when he learned the testosterone level in the baby
6 ~6 G6 ~1 F# O a. G8 s' Mwas high, he then read the product information
$ H5 r1 v1 L- v+ M& ]2 ]; I. ]packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-6 c+ V1 |0 s( ^( ~7 E
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
O+ j) W7 n V- d' {- _+ \0 ydecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the8 _. x7 W7 M R8 I: \ J
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had& U, t" o. N" ^) c2 b
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
; _4 g* k$ b3 H5 j! ^test was ordered, but the family did not go to the
C! H8 [0 y% v. Q8 O2 m, ?laboratory to obtain the test.; _9 T; Y6 x! \( H( J; B
Discussion8 E) u$ r2 T; X2 a0 G4 X
Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary+ o! C/ P% U W- n$ z& o$ \0 [ H
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
% H% r) J4 M/ @3 bPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when# z+ j& G$ J% [! o& }
it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-3 x" `) f! M( _- F
thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
+ t! q- ^# q) {! D9 v+ y3 c+ ?mon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP* _4 T% G& f% m$ I3 f: c
may have a central nervous system lesion that is! h; x* R! Z. [7 H- b* A* z% z5 D
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
# u+ Y" Y& o$ Y( _+ jamic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
, U* v& N- k# ?9 A( wsis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
8 p: x& X) E2 {' x- h8 w' uboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
" M! y/ z1 x" s; @* Bization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-( }/ t3 _( n! v8 r4 v& I
rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
9 Q) g# e7 u+ B; Kgonadotropins.1,3
; p F& W$ ]' Q1 Z! iGonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-$ x) N; [( ]; t% k
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate( { M' h( Y- c. m
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or( `: G$ w- k: ^0 d
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-8 R9 T1 C- T% H" s; ]& X6 Z+ k# g* m
ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing& i3 \$ I) E+ x+ P3 i
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
$ T3 u7 |! D2 L; O, {adrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious7 D( `0 w. Y+ Z; L! N/ n6 I5 j% {
puberty in boys.3,4
- |7 q9 x2 q: a* _The most common form of congenital adrenal% a3 j$ X3 b; J% Y# I/ a
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency. x. `8 M+ r6 W# ^5 n. F
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in
% ^* e4 `! }+ T/ v! H j2 ?excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
, u! H" I: A( u1 g/ @an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
e; F2 z$ `& L l" w/ x. Y: zexcess.1,38 ]# M- @* {8 K
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
+ l5 [1 |/ L3 K4 @: G542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007- L, n( C! B! ?" C1 ?" {5 H
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
7 U" M& `9 |; y! R0 k; i1 ` Iindependent precocious puberty, which is also known# k- [) `% Z$ W0 F
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a; R+ A c$ V( b, q$ g7 L/ [
very young age. The physical findings in these boys' l/ t3 I/ L0 ^6 |& a6 x
with this disorder are full pubertal development,
* b6 P7 o0 a; _, N) bincluding bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys
* ~$ h; f: A0 h; ]with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder! G; Y1 Y% M- n" N3 I, @ Y' C
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
/ |2 [2 ~7 {) A: fpubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-3 H! ~ w8 |0 m: H+ G/ |# \$ B V" P
releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
+ ~: ^: Y4 K' | J( r/ p0 Dautosomal dominant disorder that affects only
$ I5 J$ b' x* p) G hmales; therefore, other male members of the family Y; W" m9 Q6 o o8 g" @6 x8 A
may have similar precocious puberty.3
$ E: w6 `% Z5 Z/ V, {In our patient, physical examination was incon-& P: H2 ~" e+ D! O, T7 g
sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-2 U3 b N: r! B" w
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis0 x2 q9 }4 P. W! W: o: `& y
was in the differential diagnosis because his father
n4 G# n+ _! q% P3 tstarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,8 w0 U; h4 M# ]$ _
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the/ J# g& t2 U- L8 M7 w
beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
: D: v+ J. o# c$ ~) t9 Sative initial history of androgen exposure, our
) @) Y" T2 R+ p P3 hbiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,: V n4 l, \/ [& k0 |3 L
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase: |5 M: |: x* i& u
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-/ t" f/ ]9 Z: {) F7 f7 P# A
ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.) c6 A6 h/ H6 [" D( @/ y9 Q
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly3 M) j9 F0 n7 Q1 `: V9 O1 ?1 u
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
6 [' ?( W& ? mthe physical examination revealed the complete disap-
$ x& P( y" p& h9 R( K3 X% M! C" Apearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
9 x8 \( ?1 @7 X J$ i( e/ Ydecreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-0 R* x. Y8 D/ J6 e
terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
' F7 t# a( m" |0 W9 o$ r2 n8 l7 eusing it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
; I# B" a) q, I6 k" JDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or; _0 x% s- [ _+ k' ]. v" A$ `! L6 R: N
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
( ^$ a0 ]0 v6 v; qunprotected females through direct skin exposure.; m9 A- E7 ~3 f7 U' b' V ~
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the; W2 W0 Q1 |3 j
baseline value in those females who were exposed to2 Q6 m1 | {- M+ W( K
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male! y7 O# ^7 R5 a7 @5 a0 e: n; r; e
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-3 w. x1 k# D( X) ]% f& Q% T& _& b
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented., F8 E% I$ p* d2 w+ L4 D [5 p
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,7 L2 [* m/ k& N" O3 x) j9 N
which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
# {3 t; ~3 o$ W- x+ ?3 S' ]4 qdermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
: D. @9 |! P5 [" Aterone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more2 f5 D. h# T' M) y
active in young children exposed to testosterone
# }2 q$ G; E: Aexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-
- Q6 V; p% H( F7 h& q- }( Vdrotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to h. W& m3 f Q+ I, N- b2 u1 i
virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in+ g* e+ s4 ]% G5 S) J
children results in an increase in growth velocity and
: ?2 n9 M+ d& @$ Cadvanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
4 p; v: ?9 w$ K8 S& K# ]The long-term effect of androgen exposure during" K; {4 D/ w" P, Z4 J. T
early childhood on pubertal development and final/ \* k ~+ q4 p# s. n
adult height are not fully known and always remain4 y# Y7 ? z0 k9 P' l/ C" A% I
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-3 f2 }7 |; q! K5 [5 A) z' E
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
5 L2 r$ A9 |, s- bacceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after2 l! y/ r7 ~: J/ F2 l, q4 x
cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation' u; A3 }" i$ {5 \0 l3 m$ g
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9% G- n0 w/ F+ f( G+ @' U
There are conflicting reports and controversy& i" ]) y7 Q$ t- \ J- {# n$ x
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult8 J$ _$ @5 y* {* \- a* G+ r! A) t
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal
. q0 P1 ]: x5 n0 @adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-$ P* R) n y& g) z; ]
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However, k- k0 h& _/ R5 Q& p6 A
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
7 z( X' F H9 @/ q# _childhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult/ J; N! q; j' a! w' r
penile length in clinical studies.
! d5 }+ O' t2 F( o9 `+ ~Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is5 E1 D1 Y: Y5 ^. u* Q2 s! F& k2 ^
going to experience any of the untoward effects from
; X& }. f8 Y9 K3 u4 [testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
' g" z$ m0 f; D1 |0 U5 a7 p _$ dthe exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
3 |& N2 G& f; j, g. q' NAlthough the bone age was advanced at the time of$ Y0 z1 F5 O5 w/ Y$ I5 E
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at3 v9 e- @# u. F
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult% {' z: u! A n! A. p* o' g
height will not be affected.. G# n7 }. ]' {0 X0 F
Although rarely reported, the widespread avail-
4 q& m* G" _4 }2 j( ?1 C; W+ q" {ability of androgen products in our society may
8 q4 j* n5 k9 o9 U# ^% gindeed cause more virilization in male or female" [' q( o* A! [% X7 U3 t+ E
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
3 B Z, J: h! v2 n) I' lgen products must be considered and specific ques-
, d$ E- b- ]" w8 t! `$ O4 l. Utioning about the use of a testosterone product or0 n& v. A" o5 Z: Y
gel should be asked of the family members during
8 F/ F# q8 Z1 q' L) othe evaluation of any children who present with vir-, h/ @4 D w% L; r
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-
0 l0 Y6 C: x* ~5 Y6 qnosis can be established by just a few tests and by: Q) i6 b2 g; I. ~
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
# W' F1 Q& s' C* c- h% `history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
) ~1 r7 w+ F$ w* Wresult in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive
2 y0 L, i! T" P8 o1 G! d* l: cinvestigation. The primary care physician should be" T8 b( V% x; t; Q$ {
aware of this fact, because most of these children
! u- m/ w6 p, Z2 Y/ Cmay initially present in their practice. The Physicians’$ I$ u0 V% A8 L A8 F
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a, C' F/ [1 J1 r$ F" [
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or
( X1 V1 I6 Y8 F$ I% Y7 P: Ofemale child who might come in contact with some-% Q5 @; l3 e1 v4 M
one using any of these products.
/ A8 }0 j1 }3 u a4 |References, D7 Z" V ]. r. o
1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation; @; i8 l- p ]6 u7 h# w
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric& l" j4 ^8 S& e* A7 |1 [
Endocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
9 a. F5 _* a9 C2002: 565-628.* p# Y3 f5 e, t2 N+ f4 A4 t
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious9 }- W6 F. `! R: L% x* `( J. `
puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal6 J, e1 x% L3 d7 N# M* J
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
y, ^# o* ^8 b, {9 iTopical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 543* D' D) C& w, f& }
areas: organic central precocious puberty. Acta Paediatr.8 W+ c0 W; i9 J0 {6 r
2001;90:751-756.) T' h0 U9 c9 |
3. Lee PA. Puberty and its disorders. In: Lifshitz F, ed.
) h* Q U, ~2 z5 \ JPediatric Endocrinology. 4th ed. New York, NY: Marcel2 {: n+ F& F! U. [& x' I6 x
Dekker Inc; 2003:211-238.
. i. ?. q' N' {8 j* L4. Yu YM, Punyasavatsu N, Elder D, D’Ercole AJ. Sexual
2 {+ s3 n* y0 b0 q% ldevelopment in a two-year-old boy induced by topical9 |- V" ` C, v
exposure to testosterone. Pediatrics. 1999;104:e23.
" \& U0 J# [5 A' i5. Greulich WW, Pyle SI, eds. Radiographic Atlas of% e$ }" d7 }3 t* D8 d
Skeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist. 2nd ed.
7 h& [; G/ L0 j2 V j/ k8 @5 hStanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1959.
% b1 c: ]6 g% u% @) z2 ^1 P8 R# ~6. Physicians’ Desk Reference. Androgel 1% testosterone,
. p" p& s4 u! u* V/ Y" {Unimed Pharmaceutical Inc. Montvale, NJ: Medical
2 b. O2 q6 N2 [7 V# GEconomics Company, Inc; 2004:3239-3241.7 d' w& }6 d4 H, R8 d
7. Klugo RC, Cerny JC. Response of micropenis to topical
5 j% @9 n- Y! W- D. ttestosterone and gonadotropin. J Urol. 1978;119:
7 F" L( u; a2 o: _667-668.1 ~- c N6 p' Z4 f" e0 {
8. Guthrie RD, Smith DW, Graham CB. Testosterone
9 o, F0 Z$ u, Xtreatment for micropenis during early childhood. J Pediatr.
+ b& S f- t7 X& ~" t5 K* h, @1973;83:247-252.
3 l1 b, K* w& x. t0 T2 _9. Jacobs SC, Kaplan GW, Gittes RF. Topical testosterone2 R; M- c- K4 I4 ^/ e
therapy for penile growth. Urol. 1975;6:708-710.* Y( n6 J3 S: Z9 X
10. Husmann DA, Cain MP. Microphallus: eventual phallic' d5 }( d) _8 A( T5 A
size is dependent on the timing of androgen administra-
5 _2 s: I1 ^% t1 J& M+ b. Wtion. J Urol. 1994;152:734-739.
3 T, A/ J% n* Z6 x" E11. McMahon DR, Kramer SA, Husmann DA. Micropenis:
( G* N Z. K( x; z Q0 _1 o# T) {does early treatment with testosterone do more harm
: O* v# r$ V7 @than good? J Urol. 1995;154:825-829.7 e u. Z( i" r& l4 U& e) u% w# r
12. Takane KK, George FW, Wilson JD. Androgen receptor0 d9 H3 T% E* r ]
of rat penis is down-regulated by androgen. Am J Physiol.
5 e* a; U+ Y, x) \8 e7 y1990;258:E46-E50.
8 a, F: U- d s+ Y13. Sutherland RS, Kogan BA, Baskin LS, et al. The effect
$ l# X9 h' h; G, F7 W7 Fof prepubertal androgen exposure on adult penile) g6 }* I' Z: \ F: d
length. J Urol. 1996;156:783-787. |
|